MEPS Simulation
See how your product is likely to perform under the AS/NZS 5125.1 Appendix H test before you ship a unit to a laboratory. We simulate the Appendix H procedure on a validated heat pump water heater model, report the same quantities the lab would, and show you the margin to the proposed GEMS MEPS threshold.
Why model Appendix H before you test
Standards Australia has published AS/NZS 5125.1:2014 Amd 1, which introduces the Appendix H test method for air source heat pump water heaters. This is the method expected to underpin minimum energy performance standards (MEPS) under the GEMS framework. COP is the regulatory output: once GEMS is confirmed, the MEPS pass or fail is set against the Appendix H COP. The Decision Regulation Impact Statement has signalled a level equivalent to 60% energy savings under AS/NZS 4234, though that figure is not confirmed until the legislation is finalised.
The detail that catches manufacturers out is the delivery temperature. Appendix H requires delivered hot water at or above 50°C. AS/NZS 4234 simulation uses 45°C. A product optimised around the 45°C threshold, with a lower set point, narrow deadband, or smaller storage volume, can show reduced deliverable volume and a different COP under Appendix H. Physical testing is an expensive place to discover that. A laboratory retest at a Chinese facility runs into the tens of thousands of dollars once shipping and scheduling are counted, and adds months to a product timeline.
Simulating Appendix H first answers the questions that decide the test outcome while there is still time to act on them. It tells you where the COP sits relative to the likely MEPS level, whether the deliverable volume holds at 50°C, and which control or design change moves the result. You then book the laboratory once, for the configuration most likely to pass.
What the simulation gives you
We reproduce the Appendix H test sequence on a simulation of your unit, then report the quantities the standard measures: COP, maximum deliverable heated water volume, reheat time, recharge rate, and energy consumption. The COP is checked against the proposed MEPS threshold so you see the margin directly. The simulation runs on our in-house first-principles heat pump water heater model, validated against real test data, so the predicted behaviour reflects the physics of your specific configuration rather than a generic curve.
What you provide
Product configuration
Tank volume, set point, deadband, boost logic
Performance data
AS/NZS 5125.1 test results or component data
Control law
Compressor restart and recovery strategy
Appendix H protocol simulation
Test sequence reproduced on a validated HPWH model
What you get back
COP vs MEPS threshold
Margin to the proposed GEMS level
Deliverable volume above 50°C
Hot water available at the Appendix H threshold
Reheat time and recharge rate
Recovery after draw-off, as reported to GEMS
Where GEMS MEPS stands
Appendix H is published, but MEPS is not yet active. The compliance date, the final MEPS COP level, and the registration requirements are confirmed through GEMS legislation, which is still to come. We model against the published Appendix H method and update the assessment as the GEMS requirements firm up.
See what you receive
Here is an example of the report a MEPS simulation produces, for a representative 320 L integral R290 heat pump water heater. It reports the Appendix H quantities across the Hot, Average and Cold conditions, the same way a laboratory would.
| Deliverable | Hot | Avg | Cold |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max delivery V50 (L) | 316.4 | 317.7 | 317.9 |
| Max delivery V_del (L) | 260.3 | 261.2 | 261.2 |
| Recharge time t_RH_adj (min) | 317.7 | 344.0 | 565.3 |
| Rated 24-hr load size | 9 | 4 | 4 |
| 24-hr load L_cycle (MJ) | 85.0 | 38.0 | 38.0 |
| 24-hr COP_cycle | 3.646 | 3.032 | 1.952 |
Appendix H is not AS/NZS 4234
The two test regimes pull in different directions, and a setting that maximises one can cost the other. If you change control settings for Appendix H, the same logic must be reflected in your CER, VEU, and ESS submissions: a product should not be tested for MEPS using one configuration while being registered for incentive schemes under another. Modelling both together keeps the declarations consistent and avoids a later re-submission.
| Aspect | AS/NZS 4234 simulation | AS/NZS 5125.1 Appendix H |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum useful delivery temperature | 45°C | 50°C |
| Primary regulatory output | Annual energy savings | COP |
| What it drives | STC and VEEC certificate yield | GEMS MEPS pass or fail |
| Also reported | Not applicable | Deliverable volume, reheat time, recharge rate |
The same first-principles engine powers our Physics-based HPWH Model, where you can see how the predictions were validated blind against measured heat-up data, with COP agreeing to within 1% on the clean benchmark ambients.
What you can use it for
- Quantify the margin to the MEPS COP threshold before you book a laboratory
- Test whether control settings tuned around the 45°C AS/NZS 4234 threshold still hold up at the 50°C Appendix H threshold
- Identify likely failure modes (low deliverable volume, slow recovery) and the control or design change that fixes them
- Keep the Appendix H test configuration aligned with the control logic declared to CER, VEU, and ESS
- Screen a product range to decide which models need attention before GEMS registration
What we need to start
- Tank drawing and storage volume
- Control logic: set point, deadband, compressor restart, boost element behaviour
- An AS/NZS 5125.1 test report if available, or component datasheets
- The intended Appendix H test configuration
- Any existing AS/NZS 4234 modelling or scheme submission for the product
Some items can be estimated where documents are incomplete. We confirm what is missing at the start of the project.
Pre-assess your product against Appendix H
Send us your model details and tell us whether you already have AS/NZS 5125.1 test data. We will tell you what we need and how the assessment would run.