Review Process
How to review AS/NZS 4234 based applications.
The review process for AS/NZS 4234 modelling & submission projects occurs at two distinct stages of the modelling project:
- Gate A Review occurs at the end of the Modelling phase, prior to application preparation
- Gate B Review occurs at the end of the Application Preparation phase, prior to submission
General Rules
- If any checks fail, stop reviewing immediately and return back to Project Lead (PL).
- Exception for minor/aesthetic issues which do not flow through into the 4234 modelling, i.e. 5125 report formatting issue.
- A 100% pass rate is required to proceed to the next phase phase.
- For “FAIL REASON” clearly state what is the issue. Be specific, i.e:
- “Missing 5125 report from Client Material”
- “FP value is not consistent between 4234 report and .dck files.”
- “Tank model ID not consistent with 4692 report”
- “Tank drawing - volume above HP sensor is not >45% of tank volume.”
Gate A Review
- Documentation
- Check that all documentation for modelling is present in 02-Client_Material: AS/NZS 5125.1 report + 1-minute data, AS/NZS 4692.1 report, tank & condenser drawings.
- Model IDs
- Check system, tank and HP model IDs reconcile between test reports and tank drawings.
- Tank drawings
- Check all tank volumes and dimensions reconcile between tank drawing and 4234 Appendix TDS, and tank drawing meets EAE requirements.
- AS/NZS 4692 report
- Check all 4692 data reconciles between 4692 report and 4234 Appendix TDS:
- Tank heat loss value
- Test report number, date
- Check all 4692 data reconciles between 4692 report and 4234 Appendix TDS:
- AS/NZS 5125 report
- Check all 5125 reporting requirements are met
- Test point periods comply with 5125
- All TCs reach 60+degC
- R^2>0.95, scatterplots provided.
- AS/NZS 5125 data
- Check 5125 data (COP + Power coefficients, Tifr, Low temperature data, Standby power) in the 5125 report matches the modelling
- AS/NZS 4234 report
- Check the 4234 report for formatting and content
- Check consistency of FP value
- Check data against source material
- Ensure clarity of the report explaining any non-standard features
- TRNSYS modelling
- Ensure all modelling meets minimum criteria (MDT≥ 45, Energy Savings ≥ 60%)
- Check flow rate modelling for stand-alone systems
- Check legionella control compliance
- Check FP value consistency to 4234 report
Gate B Review
This review takes place once the application files are prepared for all submissions - CER, VEU, ESS.
- Documentation
- Ensure all audit files are included in 05-Submission:
- Model IDs
- System, tank and HP model IDs reconcile across all documents: certificates, manual, tank drawing, 4234, 5125, 4692, data plate.
- Tank drawing
- All tank volumes and dimensions reconcile between tank drawing and 4234 Appendix TDS, and tank drawing meets EAE requirements.
- Manual
- Brand & model name consistent
- Control logic default mode matches modelling settings
- Plumbing schematic included
- Warranty included (5+ years, company details and instructions provided how to claim warranty)
- Data plate
- System ID matches 2712
- Image resolution is adequate
- Declarations
- Control declaration matches modelling + manual
- Manufacturer declaration exists if brand/model differs between test report + submission
- Authorisation letter included if applicant does not own the test reports used in submission
- Product upload form (PUF)
- Check PUF data is consistent with source material
- Spot check the TRNSYS .out files